Selasa, 26 Februari 2013

Mediterranean diet shows key benefits, study finds

Mediterranean diet shows key benefits, study finds

Finally, there’s hard evidence that a Mediterranean diet can prevent heart disease.

Shunning red meats and processed food in favor of fresh fruits, vegetables, fish, nuts, olive oil, and even some wine can reduce heart attacks, strokes, and deaths from heart problems, according to the first study to demonstrate the diet’s benefits using the most reliable type of clinical trial.

Rachel Johnson, head of the American Heart Association’s nutrition committee, welcomed the findings. “We have moved away from the low-fat-at-all-cost message. It’s important to include these healthy fats in a diet,” such as olive oils and nuts.

Spanish researchers tracked thousands of participants over roughly five years and found a 30 percent reduction in the rate of heart disease, primarily strokes, among the Mediterranean diet eaters compared with people who consumed more traditional low-fat fare. That diet included more starch and grains, but fewer nuts and oils.

Continue reading below

Earlier studies had concluded there probably were benefits from a Mediterranean diet, but they weren’t definitive because of the design of the studies, including their reliance on participants’ recall of meals. Health and nutrition specialists who reviewed the latest study, published online Monday by the New England Journal of Medicine, said its size, controlled structure, and focus on patients who were at risk of heart disease offered powerful and much-needed evidence of a protective heart effect from a Mediterranean diet.

Dr. Ramon Estruch, a senior consultant at the Hospital Clinic of Barcelona who led the Spanish team, said the findings should give physicians confidence to urge patients, particularly those who are overweight or have diabetes or other risk factors for heart disease, to follow a Mediterranean approach.

“As a doctor it is easier to say take a pill,” Estruch said. “But diet is a very powerful effect in protecting against cardiovascular disease.”

Estruch’s team enrolled 7,447 people, ages 55 to 80, and then randomly assigned them to one of three groups: one that was directed to eat a Mediterranean diet that included at least 4 tablespoons a day of extra-virgin olive oil; another that also followed the Mediterranean diet and received roughly 1 additional ounce daily of a mixture of walnuts, hazelnuts, and almonds; and a third control group that was counseled to eat a low-fat diet that did not include olive oil or nuts. The olive oil included amounts used in cooking, poured on salads, and eaten in meals outside home.

All of the participants had diabetes or at least three major risk factors for heart disease, such as obesity, high blood pressure, elevated levels of bad cholesterol, or a family history of early heart disease.

Drug treatment regimens, such as medications to lower high blood pressure or cholesterol, were similar for those in all three groups.

Participants were asked annually to complete questionnaires about their health, leisure-time activities, and their diet. Scientists also tracked participants’ weight, height, and waistline measurements, in addition to testing the urine and blood of those receiving the extra-virgin olive oil and nuts to confirm compliance with the diet. No restrictions were placed on how much food any of the groups could consume.

After approximately five years, scientists counted 109 heart attacks, strokes, or deaths from heart disease in the control group, which did not eat the Mediterranean diet. By comparison, there were 83 in the Mediterranean group that ate extra nuts, and 96 in the Mediterranean group that consumed additional olive oil.

Scientists said that means that for every 1,000 people who followed the Mediterranean diet, three people each year would avoid a heart attack or stroke because of the diet.

“Even the best available drugs, like statins, reduce heart disease by about 25 percent, which is in the same ballpark as the Mediterranean diet,” said Dr. Walter Willett, professor of epidemiology and nutrition at the Harvard School of Public Health. “But the statins increase the risk of diabetes, whereas this diet can help reduce the risk.”

This study, which focused on people at high risk for heart disease, was not designed to measure whether a Mediterranean diet also protects the hearts of healthy individuals. But Willett said that based on what scientists know about cardiovascular disease, the same diet would be beneficial in healthier people.

The Spanish researchers said their findings may have been more dramatic if they compared the Mediterranean diet with more Western fare. They said most people in Spain typically eat a version of the Mediterranean diet, so the control group’s diet didn’t differ much from the Mediterranean diet, likely muting the study results. “The differences probably would be huge” if the comparison group ate a typical American diet, said Dr. Miguel Angel Martinez-Gonzalez, a study co-author and chairman of the Department of Preventive Medicine at the University of Navarra.

Getting American patients to adhere to a Mediterranean diet long term can sometimes be challenging.

Jack Bishop, editorial director at America’s Test Kitchen, a Brookline-based company that produces the popular TV show of the same name and Cooks Illustrated magazine, said a Mediterranean diet is easier to maintain than ones that require super low-fat intake.

“I am encouraged by this study,” Bishop said. “There are so many studies that leave you aloft as to what you are supposed to do, but this one is fairly clear, and the message seems doable and satisfying at the same time.”.

One unanswered question involves the type of extra-virgin olive oil used in the study. The scientists noted that they supplied a type of Spanish oil to participants that had a high level of polyphenols, a naturally occurring anti-oxidant found in fresh fruits and vegetables that is believed to have heart healthy benefits. Typical refined olive oils have much less of this substance.

Johnson, the head of the American Heart Association’s nutrition committee and a nutrition professor at the University of Vermont, said the findings demonstrate that the dietary advice offered by the association and other health groups is on the right track.

Senin, 25 Februari 2013

Former surgeon general C. Everett Koop dead at age 96

Former surgeon general C. Everett Koop dead at age 96

Koop was surgeon general from 1981 to 1989.

C. Everett Koop, the former surgeon general who brought frank talk about AIDS into American homes, has died at his home in Hanover, N.H., officials at the Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth announced Monday. He was 96.

Koop, a pediatric surgeon with a conservative reputation and a distinctive beard, was surgeon general from 1981 to 1989 during the Reagan administration and the early months of the administration of George H.W. Bush.

"Dr. Koop will be remembered for his colossal contributions to the health and well-being of patients and communities in the U.S. and around the world," said a statement released by Chip Souba, dean of the Geisel School of Medicine and Joseph O'Donnell, senior scholar at the C. Everett Koop Institute. "As one of our country's greatest surgeons general, he effectively promoted health and the prevention of disease, thereby improving millions of lives in our nation and across the globe."

He is best remembered for his official 1986 report on AIDS â€" a plain-spoken 36-page document that talked about the way AIDS spread (through sex, needles and blood), the ways it did not spread (through casual contact in homes, schools and workplaces) and how people could protect themselves.

The report advocated condom use for the sexually active and sex education for schoolchildren, pleasantly surprising liberals and upsetting many of Koop's former supporters. An ei ght-page version was mailed to every American household in 1988.

The brochure came in a sealed packet with the warning that "some of the issues involved in this brochure may not be things you are used to discussing openly."

In interviews and speeches, Koop always stressed that sexual abstinence and monogamy were the best protection against AIDS, but that medical experts had a duty to tell people who did not choose those paths how they could stay healthy.

"My position on AIDS was dictated by scientific integrity and Christian compassion," Koop wrote in his 1991 biography, Koop: The Memoirs of America's Family Doctor.

Koop also made his mark in the fight against smoking, with another 1986 report that alerted the public to the dangers of second-hand smoke â€" setting the stage for today's widespread prohibitions against smoking in public places.

At one point, Koop was the second-most recognized public official in the United States, after Pr esident Reagan, says Alexandra Lord, a former Public Health Service historian and author of "Condom Nation: The US Government's Sex Education Campaign from World War I to the Internet." He was one of the most high-profile surgeons general, before or since, she says -- though she says people under age 35 or so may not know his name today.

Charles Everett Koop was born in Brooklyn on Oct. 14, 1916. He briefly played football at Dartmouth College, where he acquired his lifelong nickname Chick, according to a biography posted online by the National Library of Medicine. An early fascination with medicine eventually led him to Cornell University Medical College. In 1945, he became first surgeon in chief at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, a position he held until his appointment as surgeon general.

His nomination for that position was opposed by groups who feared he would use the office to promote his anti-abortion views â€" which he said were developed during a c areer saving newborns with life-threatening birth defects. But Koop avoided pronouncements on abortion during his tenure.

After he left office, he became one of the first high-profile doctors to establish a presence online. His website, DrKoop.com, was launched in 1997 and was intended to provide reliable health information to the public, he said. But Koop and his backers faced criticism over ties with companies advertising on the site. Like many Internet efforts of the era, it failed, going bankrupt in 2001.

Koop remained active, though, heading his C. Everett Koop Institute at Dartmouth in New Hampshire. At a news conference in Washington, D.C., in 2010, when he was 94, he spoke from a wheelchair and told reporters that he was "very, very deaf" and legally blind, the Washington Post reported.

But he still had the strength to warn that AIDS was becoming a "forgotten epidemic." Although 56,000 Americans were still getting infected each year, "simply put, HIV is no longer on the public's radar screen," he said.

Jumat, 22 Februari 2013

FDA approves Roche drug for late-stage breast cancer

FDA approves Roche drug for late-stage breast cancer

Fri Feb 22, 2013 12:30pm EST

(Reuters) - U.S. health regulators approved a new drug made by Swiss drugmaker Roche Holding AG for some patients with late-stage metastatic breast cancer who fail to respond to other therapies.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration said on Friday it had approved Kadcyla, also known as ado-trastuzumab emtansine, for patients whose cancer cells contain increased amounts of a protein known as HER2.

The drug's label will carry a boxed warning, the most serious possible, of the drug's potential to cause liver and heart damage or even death. The drug can also cause life-threatening birth defects.

In clinical trials, patients who took the drug, known during its development process as T-DM1, survived an average of 30.9 months, compared with 25.1 months in a control group.

Analysts at Jefferies have estimated the drug could generate annual peak sales of $1.9 billion as usage in different settings increases. The drug will be priced at $9,800 a month.

"We don't expect to see significant payer pushback on pricing at launch, given the drug's efficacy and safety," said Simos Simeoni dis, an analyst at Cowen and Company, in a research note.

Kadcyla works by attaching trastuzumab, sold under the brand name Herceptin, to a drug called DM1, developed by ImmunoGen Inc, which interferes with cancer cell growth.

"Kadcyla delivers the drug to the cancer site to shrink the tumor, slow disease progression and prolong survival," said Dr Richard Pazdur, director of the FDA's office of hematology and oncology products. "It is the fourth approved drug that targets the HER2 protein."

Other drugs approved for the disease include Herceptin in 1998, lapatinib, made by GlaxoSmithKline Plc and sold under the brand name Tykerb in 2007, and pertuzumab, marketed as Perjeta and also made by Roche, in 2012.

The approval triggers a $10.5 million payment to ImmunoGen and sets the stage for the company to receive royalties of between 3 and 5 percent, depending on sales. The 5 percent level is triggered whe n sales top $700 million in the United States. The company also receives 5 percent when sales top $700 million elsewhere in the world.

Kadcyla is the first drug in its class, known as antibody-drug conjugates, or "armed antibodies" to be approved to treat a solid tumor. These drugs combine an antibody, Herceptin in the case of Kadcyla, with a killer toxin, in this case ImmunoGen's DM1, and links them together to deliver a highly potent bomb to the diseased cells.

The drugs seek out specific cells that express proteins associated with the cancer, while leaving other cells alone.

Breast cancer is the second-leading cause of cancer-related death among women. An estimated 232,340 women will be diagnosed with the disease in 2013, and 39,620 will die from it, according to the National Cancer Institute. About 20 percent of breast cancer patients have increased amounts of the HER2 protein.

The most common si de effects in patients treated with Kadcyla were nausea, fatigue, muscle and joint pain, increased liver enzymes, headache and constipation.

Shares of ImmunoGen were up 2.6 percent at $14.67 in midday trading on the Nasdaq. Roche's shares were up 1.5 percent at 212 Swiss francs.

(Reporting by Toni Clarke in Washington; editing by Gerald E. McCormick, John Wallace and Matthew Lewis)

Kamis, 21 Februari 2013

Women's Heart Disease Awareness Still Needs Improvement

Women's Heart Disease Awareness Still Needs Improvement

Editor's Choice
Academic Journal
Main Category: Heart Disease
Also Included In: Women's Health / Gynecology;  Cardiovascular / Cardiology
Article Date: 21 Feb 2013 - 0:00 PST

email to a friend   printer friendly   opinions   <!-- rate article
Patient / Public:

Healthcare Prof:


Over the past fifteen years the number of women aware that heart disease is the number one killer has almost doubled. However, this awareness is still lacking among young women and minorities, according to a recent study published in the journal Circulation.

It is an umbrella term that includes a spectrum of different disorders that all affect the heart. Heart disease is the leading cause of death in the USA, UK, Australia, and Canada. In the U.S. it is responsible for a little over a quarter of all deaths.

In the study, the researchers compared female awareness about heart disease in 1997 to their awareness in 2012. They conducted online and telephone surveys that assessed the women's lifestyle, awareness of leading causes of death, and understanding of heart disease.

The difference was quite marked; in 1997 only 30 percent of women knew that heart disease was the leading killer, compared to 56 percent in 2012.

Fifteen years ago, women were more likely to believe that cancer was the leading killer, rather than heart disease (35 percent versus 30 percent). In 2012, the percentage of women who cited cancer as the number one killer dropped to 24%, indicating that awareness among the general population has improved.

However, among minority groups, only 36 percent of African-American and 34 percent of Hispanic women knew that heart disease was the leading killer - percentages similar to those found in white women in 1997.

The lowest awareness rate among all age groups was in women 25-34 years of age - 44 percent correctly cited heart disease as the leading killer. Most young women said that their doctors were not likely to inform them about heart disease and the associated risks.

Lori Mosca, M.D, M.P.H., Ph.D., lead author of the study, said:

"Habits established in younger women can have lifelong rewards. We need to speak to the new generation, and help them understand that living heart healthy is going to help them feel better, not just help them live longer. So often the message is focused on how many women are dying from heart disease, but we need to be talking about how women are going to live - and live healthier."

The authors also found also found that:

  • Ethnic minorities trusted their healthcare providers more than whites did.
  • Only 6 percent of women aged 25-34 discussed heart disease with their doctors versus 33 percent of those above the age of 65.
  • 45 percent of women would take preventive action to live longer as opposed to 61 percent who would to feel better.
  • Self-reported depression was fairly common among the respondents
Mosca concluded:

"There are gaps between women's personal awareness and what they're doing in terms of preventive steps. The American Heart Association has well-established, evidence-based guidelines about heart disease prevention, so we have to better align women's actions with what is evidence-based."

Written by Joseph Nordqvist
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today

Fifteen-Year Trends in Awareness of Heart Disease in Women
Lori Mosca, MD, MPH, PhD, Chair; Gmerice Hammond, MD; Heidi Mochari-Greenberger, PhD, MPH, RD; Amytis Towfighi, MD; Michelle A. Albert, MD, MPH
Circulation Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA


APA

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.



Add Your Opinion On This Article

'Women's Heart Disease Awareness Still Needs Improvement'

Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.

If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.

All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)

Contact Our News Editors

For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.

Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:

Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions

MediLexicon International Ltd
Bexhill-on-Sea, United Kingdom
MediLexicon International Ltd © 2004-2013 All rights reserved.
MNT (logo) is the registered EU trade mark of MediLexicon Int. Limited.

back to top | home | privacy policy

MediLexicon International Ltd
Bexhill-on-Sea, United Kingdom
MediLexicon International Ltd © 2004-2013 All rights reserved.
MNT (logo) is the registered EU trade mark of MediLexicon Int. Limited.

Selasa, 19 Februari 2013

Sars-like virus death reported in UK

Sars-like virus death reported in UK

CoronavirusScientists have sequenced the infection's full genome

A patient infected with a new respiratory illness similar to the deadly Sars virus has died in the UK.

He was being treated at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital in Birmingham and died on Sunday morning, the hospital has confirmed.

Of the 12 people known to have been infected with the virus around the world, six have died.

The threat to the general population is thought to be small, although the virus has shown signs of spreading in people.

Three members of the same family have been infected with the virus in the UK as well as another patient who was flown in from Qatar for treatment.

It is thought one family member picked up the virus while travelling to the Middle East and Pakistan and then the virus spread to his son and another family member.

The son, who died, had a weakened immune system, which would have left him more vulnerable to the infection.

Continue reading the main story

Confirmed cases

Saudi Arabia: Five cases, three deaths

Jordan: Two cases, two deaths

UK: Four cases, one death

Germany: One case, flown from Qatar

Total: 12 cases, six deaths

Source: Health Protection Agency/World Health Organization

The hospital said it extended its sympathies to the family and was working with the Health Protection Agency to test other people who may have come into contact with the virus.

The infection causes pneumonia and sometimes kidney failure.

The exact source of the new virus and how it spreads is still unknown. The leading theory is that it comes from animals and the new Sars-like virus does appear to be closely related to a virus in bats.

The threat posed by the virus is thought to be low as it struggles to spread in people.

Dr Paul Cosford, deputy chief executive of the Health Protection Agency

Please turn on JavaScript. Media requires JavaScript to play.

Speaking on Thursday, Dr Paul Cosford, deputy chief executive at the HPA, said: "It appears very difficult to catch"

Prof John Watson, head of the respiratory diseases department at the Health Protection Agency, said: "The routes of transmission to humans of the novel coronavirus have not yet been fully determined, but the recent UK experience provides strong evidence of human-to-human transmission in at least some circumstances.

"The three recent cases in the UK represent an important opportunity to obtain more information about the characteristics of this infection in humans and risk factors for its acquisition, particularly in the light of the first ever recorded instance of apparently lower severity of illness in one of the cases.

"The risk of infection in contacts in most circumstances is still considered to be low and the risk associated with novel coronavirus to the general UK population remains very low."

Prof Ian Jones, from the University of Reading, said: "Given the previous health status of the patient it may be premature to assume the death was a result of the infection but even if it was, it is unlikely to signify a change in the virus.

"No general virus spread has been reported meaning the risk to the public remains very low."

Does childhood TV viewing lead to criminal behavior?

Does childhood TV viewing lead to criminal behavior?

Two recent studies linking childhood television viewing to antisocial behavior and criminal acts as adults are prompting some pediatricians to call for a national boob tube intervention.

A commentary published alongside the studies in the journal Pediatrics on Monday lamented the fact that most parents have failed to limit their children's television viewing to no more than one or two hours a day -- a recommendation made by the American Academy of Pediatrics.

On average, preschool-age children in the United States spend 4.4 hours per day in front of the television, either at home or in daycare.

"The problem is, they are not listening," wrote Dr. Claire McCarthy, a pediatrician at Boston Children's Hospital. "With our society of smartphones and YouTube and video streaming, screen time is becoming more a part of daily life, not less."

Now, based on evidence from a University of Washington study, McCarthy and others say that pediatricians should focus instead on the type of television children are viewing. Parents should steer children toward educational or "prosocial" programming instead of shows featuring violence and aggression.

"It is a variation on the 'if you can't beat 'em join 'em' idea," McCarthy wrote. "If the screens are going to be on, let's concentrate on the content, and how we can make it work for children."

The consequences are significant, experts say.

A study conducted by the University of Otago in New Zealand concluded that every extra hour of television watched by children on a weeknight increased by 30% the risk of having a criminal conviction by age 26.

The study was based on 1,037 New Zealanders born in 1972 and 1973, and interviewed at regular intervals until age 26. It also involved a review of criminal and mental health records.

"Young adults who had spent more time watching television during childhood and adolescence were significantly more likely to have a criminal conviction, a diagnosis of antisocial personality disorder, and more aggressive personality traits compared with those who viewed less television," wrote Lindsay Robertson, the lead author and a public health researcher at Dunedin School of Medicine.

In the University of Washington study, researchers devised a "media diet intervention" in which parents were assisted in substituting prosocial and education programming for more violent fare. However, the parents were not asked to reduce their children's total viewing time.

The study involved 565 Seattle-area parents with children ages 3 to 5 and lasted a year. A control group of children were allowed to watch television as they usually did, while the intervention group was steered toward programming that featured nonviolent conflict resolution, cooperative problem solving, manners and empathy. (Examples of such shows included "Dora the Explorer," "Sesame Street" and "Super Why.") 

Both groups of children were evaluated for their social competence after six months and after 12 months.

The intervention group showed "significant improvements" in social competence testing scores after six months, wrote Dr. Dimitri Christakis, lead author and pediatrics professor. Low-income boys appeared to benefit the most, authors said.

"Although television is frequently implicated as a cause of many problems in children, our research indicates that it may also be part of the solution," authors wrote.

The authors of both papers noted that the studies were limited in some respects.

Authors of the New Zealand study said it was possible that antisocial behavior itself led to more television viewing.

And authors of the Seattle study noted that while parents were not told of the purpose of the study, they may have figured it out and modified their behavior, biasing the results.

Return to Booster Shots blog.

Follow me on Twitter @montemorin.

Senin, 18 Februari 2013

TV Shows Can Improve Behavior Among Children

TV Shows Can Improve Behavior Among Children

Editor's Choice
Academic Journal
Main Category: Pediatrics / Children's Health
Article Date: 18 Feb 2013 - 11:00 PST

email to a friend   printer friendly   opinions   <!-- rate article


Patient / Public:

Healthcare Prof:

5 (2 votes)


Television has a huge influence over children; with most kids mimicking the behaviors they see on screen - whether it be loving or violent. U.S. preschoolers watch an average of four hours of TV everyday and researchers believe that instead of trying to limit the amount of television they watch, it is best to encourage shows that promote positive behavior.

The study, published in Pediatrics, identified that there are ways that TV watching can impact children's behavior in a positive way.

According to the abstract:

"Although previous studies have revealed that preschool-aged children imitate both aggression and pro-social behaviors on screen, there have been few population-based studies designed to reduce aggression in preschool-aged children by modifying what they watch."

By modifying what children watch on TV and reducing exposure to screen violence and increasing exposure to pro-social programming, the researchers identified a positive change in behavior among preschoolers.

The lead author of the study, Dimitri Christakis, said: "We've known for decades that kids imitate what they see on TV. They imitate good behaviors and they imitate bad behaviors."

A total of 820 families with kids aged 3 to 5 were included in the study.

They developed a media diet intervention that assisted half of these families in replacing aggression-laden programming with good quality educational and pro-social programming. Shows such as "Dora the Explorer" and "Sesame Street" were part of a recommended program guide given to parents - these are shows that encourage diversity and teach important life lessons.


Shows such as Sesame Street promote values and life lessons that are good for children.

The rest of the families were part of the control group which did not include any form of intervention.

The families were followed up regularly to evaluate any changes in viewing and behavioral habits. In comparison to the controls, the children who were part of the media diet intervention group spent considerably less time watching violent shows after 6 and 12 months than they did at the start of the study.

Children in the intervention group were found to be less aggressive

Changes in behavior among the children were derived from the Social Competence and Behavior Evaluation. At 6 months the score was 2.11 points higher in the intervention group than the controls, demonstrating less aggression and an overall increase in pro-social behavior. This indicates that the intervention was successful at positively impacting behavior among children.

In 2007, researchers explained at the British Psychological Society's Developmental Section Annual Conference that kids learn from television if pictures are accompanied by language in the same way as in real life.

However, it is crucial that parents fully understand the potential physical health risks associated with children watching an excessive amount of TV. Findings published in the International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity identified that the more hours children watch TV, the more their physical fitness decreases.

Written by Joseph Nordqvist
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today

"Modifying Media Content for Preschool Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial"
Dimitri A. Christakis, MD, MPH, Michelle M. Garrison, PhDa,c, Todd Herrenkohl, PhD, Kevin Haggerty, MSW, Frederick P. Rivara, MD, MPH, Chuan Zhou, PhD, and Kimberly Liekweg, BA
Pediatrics Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA


APA

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.




Add Your Opinion On This Article

'TV Shows Can Improve Behavior Among Children'

Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.

If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.

All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)

Contact Our News Editors

For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.

Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:

Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions

MediLexicon International Ltd
Bexhill-on-Sea, United Kingdom
MediLexicon International Ltd © 2004-2013 All rights reserved.
MNT (logo) is the registered EU trade mark of MediLexicon Int. Limited.

back to top | home | privacy policy

MediLexicon International Ltd
Bexhill-on-Sea, United Kingdom
MediLexicon International Ltd © 2004-2013 All rights reserved.
MNT (logo) is the registered EU trade mark of MediLexicon Int. Limited.

TV Shows Can Improve Behavior Among Children

TV Shows Can Improve Behavior Among Children

Editor's Choice
Academic Journal
Main Category: Pediatrics / Children's Health
Article Date: 18 Feb 2013 - 11:00 PST

email to a friend   printer friendly   opinions   <!-- rate article


Patient / Public:

Healthcare Prof:

5 (2 votes)


Television has a huge influence over children; with most kids mimicking the behaviors they see on screen - whether it be loving or violent. U.S. preschoolers watch an average of four hours of TV everyday and researchers believe that instead of trying to limit the amount of television they watch, it is best to encourage shows that promote positive behavior.

The study, published in Pediatrics, identified that there are ways that TV watching can impact children's behavior in a positive way.

According to the abstract:

"Although previous studies have revealed that preschool-aged children imitate both aggression and pro-social behaviors on screen, there have been few population-based studies designed to reduce aggression in preschool-aged children by modifying what they watch."

By modifying what children watch on TV and reducing exposure to screen violence and increasing exposure to pro-social programming, the researchers identified a positive change in behavior among preschoolers.

The lead author of the study, Dimitri Christakis, said: "We've known for decades that kids imitate what they see on TV. They imitate good behaviors and they imitate bad behaviors."

A total of 820 families with kids aged 3 to 5 were included in the study.

They developed a media diet intervention that assisted half of these families in replacing aggression-laden programming with good quality educational and pro-social programming. Shows such as "Dora the Explorer" and "Sesame Street" were part of a recommended program guide given to parents - these are shows that encourage diversity and teach important life lessons.


Shows such as Sesame Street promote values and life lessons that are good for children.

The rest of the families were part of the control group which did not include any form of intervention.

The families were followed up regularly to evaluate any changes in viewing and behavioral habits. In comparison to the controls, the children who were part of the media diet intervention group spent considerably less time watching violent shows after 6 and 12 months than they did at the start of the study.

Children in the intervention group were found to be less aggressive

Changes in behavior among the children were derived from the Social Competence and Behavior Evaluation. At 6 months the score was 2.11 points higher in the intervention group than the controls, demonstrating less aggression and an overall increase in pro-social behavior. This indicates that the intervention was successful at positively impacting behavior among children.

In 2007, researchers explained at the British Psychological Society's Developmental Section Annual Conference that kids learn from television if pictures are accompanied by language in the same way as in real life.

However, it is crucial that parents fully understand the potential physical health risks associated with children watching an excessive amount of TV. Findings published in the International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity identified that the more hours children watch TV, the more their physical fitness decreases.

Written by Joseph Nordqvist
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today

"Modifying Media Content for Preschool Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial"
Dimitri A. Christakis, MD, MPH, Michelle M. Garrison, PhDa,c, Todd Herrenkohl, PhD, Kevin Haggerty, MSW, Frederick P. Rivara, MD, MPH, Chuan Zhou, PhD, and Kimberly Liekweg, BA
Pediatrics Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA


APA

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.




Add Your Opinion On This Article

'TV Shows Can Improve Behavior Among Children'

Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.

If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.

All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)

Contact Our News Editors

For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.

Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:

Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions

MediLexicon International Ltd
Bexhill-on-Sea, United Kingdom
MediLexicon International Ltd © 2004-2013 All rights reserved.
MNT (logo) is the registered EU trade mark of MediLexicon Int. Limited.

back to top | home | privacy policy

MediLexicon International Ltd
Bexhill-on-Sea, United Kingdom
MediLexicon International Ltd © 2004-2013 All rights reserved.
MNT (logo) is the registered EU trade mark of MediLexicon Int. Limited.

TV Shows Can Improve Behavior Among Children

TV Shows Can Improve Behavior Among Children

Editor's Choice
Academic Journal
Main Category: Pediatrics / Children's Health
Article Date: 18 Feb 2013 - 11:00 PST

email to a friend   printer friendly   opinions   <!-- rate article


Patient / Public:

Healthcare Prof:

5 (2 votes)


Television has a huge influence over children; with most kids mimicking the behaviors they see on screen - whether it be loving or violent. U.S. preschoolers watch an average of four hours of TV everyday and researchers believe that instead of trying to limit the amount of television they watch, it is best to encourage shows that promote positive behavior.

The study, published in Pediatrics, identified that there are ways that TV watching can impact children's behavior in a positive way.

According to the abstract:

"Although previous studies have revealed that preschool-aged children imitate both aggression and pro-social behaviors on screen, there have been few population-based studies designed to reduce aggression in preschool-aged children by modifying what they watch."

By modifying what children watch on TV and reducing exposure to screen violence and increasing exposure to pro-social programming, the researchers identified a positive change in behavior among preschoolers.

The lead author of the study, Dimitri Christakis, said: "We've known for decades that kids imitate what they see on TV. They imitate good behaviors and they imitate bad behaviors."

A total of 820 families with kids aged 3 to 5 were included in the study.

They developed a media diet intervention that assisted half of these families in replacing aggression-laden programming with good quality educational and pro-social programming. Shows such as "Dora the Explorer" and "Sesame Street" were part of a recommended program guide given to parents - these are shows that encourage diversity and teach important life lessons.


Shows such as Sesame Street promote values and life lessons that are good for children.

The rest of the families were part of the control group which did not include any form of intervention.

The families were followed up regularly to evaluate any changes in viewing and behavioral habits. In comparison to the controls, the children who were part of the media diet intervention group spent considerably less time watching violent shows after 6 and 12 months than they did at the start of the study.

Children in the intervention group were found to be less aggressive

Changes in behavior among the children were derived from the Social Competence and Behavior Evaluation. At 6 months the score was 2.11 points higher in the intervention group than the controls, demonstrating less aggression and an overall increase in pro-social behavior. This indicates that the intervention was successful at positively impacting behavior among children.

In 2007, researchers explained at the British Psychological Society's Developmental Section Annual Conference that kids learn from television if pictures are accompanied by language in the same way as in real life.

However, it is crucial that parents fully understand the potential physical health risks associated with children watching an excessive amount of TV. Findings published in the International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity identified that the more hours children watch TV, the more their physical fitness decreases.

Written by Joseph Nordqvist
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today

"Modifying Media Content for Preschool Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial"
Dimitri A. Christakis, MD, MPH, Michelle M. Garrison, PhDa,c, Todd Herrenkohl, PhD, Kevin Haggerty, MSW, Frederick P. Rivara, MD, MPH, Chuan Zhou, PhD, and Kimberly Liekweg, BA
Pediatrics Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA


APA

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.




Add Your Opinion On This Article

'TV Shows Can Improve Behavior Among Children'

Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.

If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.

All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)

Contact Our News Editors

For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.

Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:

Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions

MediLexicon International Ltd
Bexhill-on-Sea, United Kingdom
MediLexicon International Ltd © 2004-2013 All rights reserved.
MNT (logo) is the registered EU trade mark of MediLexicon Int. Limited.

back to top | home | privacy policy

MediLexicon International Ltd
Bexhill-on-Sea, United Kingdom
MediLexicon International Ltd © 2004-2013 All rights reserved.
MNT (logo) is the registered EU trade mark of MediLexicon Int. Limited.

Sabtu, 16 Februari 2013

Synthetic marijuana linked to kidney damage and failure, warns new study

Synthetic marijuana linked to kidney damage and failure, warns new study

Before you light up a blunt full of synthetic marijuana, consider what the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found in a study of synthetic cannabinoid use.

The CDC took a look at sixteen cases of acute kidney injury following exposure to synthetic marijuana, according to the CDC’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. The patients ranged in age from 15 to 33 years and none reported a history of kidney disease.

All 16 patients first visited emergency departments and subsequently were hospitalized for further treatment, according to the report. The patients were young, previously healthy males who admitted to smoking either a blueberry-flavored synthetic cannabinoid product or an unspecified synthetic cannabinoid product.

Synthetic marijuana is sold under many names, including K2, fake weed, Yucatan Fire, Skunk, Moon Rocks and several others, according to the National Institute on Drug Abuse. All of these products contain dried, shredded planet material and chemical additives that give the drug its mind-altering effects.

The National Institute on Drug Abuse adds that synthetic marijuana is popular among young people. The misperception that synthetic marijuana products are “natural” and therefore safe have probably contributed to their popularity among high school students. K2 is also difficult to detect in standard drug tests.

“Synthetic cannabinoids are not safe alternatives to marijuana,” Michael Schwartz, a co-author of the CDC report, told USA Today. “There are unexpected and unpredictable health problems that can occur.”

The National Institute of Drug Abuse also notes that synthetic marijuana has been relatively easy to purchase in head shops, gas stations and online.

“The availability of the synthetic cannabinoid products, coupled with how rapidly the chemicals present in the various products change, really creates a recipe for a public health disaster,” added Schwartz, a medical officer in the CDC’s National Center for Environmental Health.

The Washington Post reports that Maryland lawmakers are getting tough on synthetic marijuana, making the manufacture, possession or distribution of the drug illegal throughout the Old Line State. In 2012, President Barack Obama banned synthetic marijuana and similar drugs, according to the Post.

The new federal law placed 26 substances in the list of Schedule 1 controlled substances. However, drug manufactures will make minor changes to their products to develop substances not located on the list.

The CDC notes that law enforcement officials, public health officials, clinicians, scientists and the public should be aware of the dangers of synthetic cannabinoid use.

Will the CDC’s report on synthetic marijuana convince lawmakers to add additional varieties of synthetic marijuana to the federal list of Schedule 1 controlled substances? If some states have already made the move toward legalizing recreational marijuana use (Colorado and Washington State), what should be done about synthetic marijuana? Share your thoughts in the comments section.

Livestrong Tattoos as Reminder of Personal Connections, Not Tarnished Brand

Livestrong Tattoos as Reminder of Personal Connections, Not Tarnished Brand

As Jax Mariash went under the tattoo needle to have “Livestrong” emblazoned on her wrist in bold black letters, she did not think about Lance Armstrong or doping allegations, but rather the 10 people affected by cancer she wanted to commemorate in ink. It was Jan. 22, 2010, exactly a year since the disease had taken the life of her stepfather. After years of wearing yellow Livestrong wristbands, she wanted something permanent.

A lifelong runner, Mariash got the tattoo to mark her 10-10-10 goal to run the Chicago Marathon on Oct. 10, 2010, and fund-raising efforts for Livestrong. Less than three years later, antidoping officials laid out their case against Armstrong â€" a lengthy account of his practice of doping and bullying. He did not contest the charges and was barred for life from competing in Olympic sports.

“It’s heartbreaking,” Mariash, of Wilson, Wyo., said of the antidoping officials’ report, released in October, and Armstrong’s subsequent confession to Oprah Winfrey. “When I look at the tattoo now, I just think of living strong, and it’s more connected to the cancer fight and optimal health than Lance.”

Mariash is among those dealing with the fallout from Armstrong’s descent. She is not alone in having Livestrong permanently emblazoned on her skin.

Now the tattoos are a complicated, internationally recognized symbol of both an epic crusade against cancer and a cyclist who stood defiant in the face of accusations for years but ultimately admitted to lying.

The Internet abounds with epidermal reminders of the power of the Armstrong and Livestrong brands: the iconic yellow bracelet permanently wrapped around a wrist; block letters stretching along a rib cage; a heart on a foot bearing the word Livestrong; a mural on a back depicting Armstrong with the years of his now-stripped seven Tour de France victories and the phrase “ride with pride.”

While history has provided numerous examples of ill-fated tattoos to commemorate lovers, sports teams, gang membership and bands that break up, the Livestrong image is a complex one, said Michael Atkinson, a sociologist at the University of Toronto who has studied tattoos.

“People often regret the pop culture tattoos, the mass commodified tattoos,” said Atkinson, who has a Guns N’ Roses tattoo as a marker of his younger days. “A lot of people can’t divorce the movement from Lance Armstrong, and the Livestrong movement is a social movement. It’s very real and visceral and embodied in narrative survivorship. But we’re still not at a place where we look at a tattoo on the body and say that it’s a meaningful thing to someone.”

Geoff Livingston, a 40-year-old marketing professional in Washington, D.C., said that since Armstrong’s confession to Winfrey, he has received taunts on Twitter and inquiries at the gym regarding the yellow Livestrong armband tattoo that curls around his right bicep.

“People see it and go, ‘Wow,’ ” he said, “But I’m not going to get rid of it, and I’m not going to stop wearing short sleeves because of it. It’s about my family, not Lance Armstrong.”

Livingston got the tattoo in 2010 to commemorate his brother-in-law, who was told he had cancer and embarked on a fund-raising campaign for the charity. If he could raise $ 5,000, he agreed to get a tattoo. Within four days, the goal was exceeded, and Livingston went to a tattoo parlor to get his seventh tattoo.

“It’s actually grown in emotional significance for me,” Livingston said of the tattoo. “It brought me closer to my sister. It was a big statement of support.”

For Eddie Bonds, co-owner of Rabbit Bicycle in Hill City, S.D., getting a Livestrong tattoo was also a reflection of the growth of the sport of cycling. His wife, Joey, operates a tattoo parlor in front of their store, and in 2006 she designed a yellow Livestrong band that wraps around his right calf, topped off with a series of small cyclists.

“He kept breaking the Livestrong bands,” Joey Bonds said. “So it made more sense to tattoo it on him.”

“It’s about the cancer, not Lance,” Eddie Bonds said.

That was also the case for Jeremy Nienhouse, a 37-year old in Denver, Colo., who used a Livestrong tattoo to commemorate his own triumph over testicular cancer.

Given the diagnosis in 2004, Nienhouse had three rounds of chemotherapy, which ended on March 15, 2005, the date he had tattooed on his left arm the day after his five-year anniversary of being cancer free in 2010. It reads: “3-15-05” and “LIVESTRONG” on the image of a yellow band.

Nienhouse said he had heard about Livestrong and Armstrong’s own battle with the cancer around the time he learned he had cancer, which alerted him to the fact that even though he was young and healthy, he, too, could have cancer.

“On a personal level,” Nienhouse said, “he sounds like kind of a jerk. But if he hadn’t been in the public eye, I don’t know if I would have been diagnosed when I had been.”

Nienhouse said he had no plans to have the tattoo removed.

As for Mariash, she said she read every page of the antidoping officials’ report. She soon donated her Livestrong shirts, shorts and running gear. She watched Armstrong’s confession to Winfrey and wondered if his apology was an effort to reduce his ban from the sport or a genuine appeal to those who showed their support to him and now wear a visible sign of it.

“People called me ‘Miss Livestrong,’ ” Mariash said. “It was part of my identity.”

She also said she did not plan to have her tattoo removed.

“I wanted to show it’s forever,” she said. “Cancer isn’t something that just goes away from people. I wanted to show this is permanent and keep people remembering the fight.”

Jumat, 15 Februari 2013

Fat Dad: Baking for Love

Fat Dad: Baking for Love

Fat Dad

Dawn Lerman writes about growing up with a fat dad.

My grandmother Beauty always told me that the way to a man’s heart was through his stomach, and by the look of pure delight on my dad’s face when he ate a piece of warm, homemade chocolate cake, or bit into a just-baked crispy cookie, I grew to believe this was true. I had no doubt that when the time came, and I liked a boy, that a batch of my gooey, rich, chocolatey brownies would cast him under a magic spell, and we would live happily ever.

But when Hank Thomas walked into Miss Seawall’s ninth grade algebra class on a rainy, September day and smiled at me with his amazing grin, long brown hair, big green eyes and Jimi Hendrix T-shirt, I was completely unprepared for the avalanche of emotions that invaded every fiber of my being. Shivers, a pounding heart, and heat overcame me when he asked if I knew the value of 1,000 to the 25th power. The only answer I could think of, as I fumbled over my words, was “love me, love me,” but I managed to blurt out “1E+75.” I wanted to come across as smart and aloof, but every time he looked at me, I started stuttering and sweating as my face turned bright red. No one had ever looked at me like that: as if he knew me, as if he knew how lost I was and how badly I needed to be loved.

Hank, who was a year older than me, was very popular and accomplished. Unlike other boys who were popular for their looks or athletic skills, Hank was smart and talented. He played piano and guitar, and composed the most beautiful classical and rock concertos that left both teachers and students in awe.

Unlike Hank, I had not quite come into my own yet. I was shy, had raggedy messy hair that I tied back into braids, and my clothes were far from stylish. My mother and sister had been on the road touring for the past year with the Broadway show “Annie.” My sister had been cast as a principal orphan, and I stayed home with my dad to attend high school. My dad was always busy with work and martini dinners that lasted late into the night. I spent most of my evenings at home alone baking and making care packages for my sister instead of coercing my parents to buy me the latest selection of Gloria Vanderbilt jeans â€" the rich colored bluejeans with the swan stitched on the back pocket that you had to lie on your bed to zip up. It was the icon of cool for the popular and pretty girls. I was neither, but Hank picked me to be his math partner anyway.

With every equation we solved, my love for Hank became more desperate. After several months of exchanging smiles, I decided to make Hank a batch of my chocolate brownies for Valentine’s Day â€" the brownies that my dad said were like his own personal nirvana. My dad named them “closet” brownies, because when I was a little girl and used to make them for the family, he said that as soon as he smelled them coming out of the oven, he could imagine dashing away with them into the closet and devouring the whole batch.

After debating for hours if I should make the brownies with walnuts or chips, or fill the centers with peanut butter or caramel, I got to work. I had made brownies hundreds of times before, but this time felt different. With each ingredient I carefully stirred into the bowl, my heart began beating harder. I felt like I was going to burst from excitement. Surely, after Hank tasted these, he would love me as much as I loved him. I was not just making him brownies. I was showing him who I was, and what mattered to me. After the brownies cooled, I sprinkled them with a touch of powdered sugar and wrapped them with foil and r ed tissue paper. The next day I placed them in Hank’s locker, with a note saying, “Call me.”

After seven excruciating days with no call, some smiles and the usual small talk in math class, I conjured up the nerve to ask Hank if he liked my brownies.

“The brownies were from you?” he asked. “They were delicious.”

Then Hank invited me to a party at his house the following weekend. Without hesitation, I responded that I would love to come. I pleaded with my friend Sarah to accompany me.

As the day grew closer, I made my grandmother Beauty’s homemade fudge â€" the chocolate fudge she made for Papa the night before he proposed to her. Stirring the milk, butter and sugar together eased my nerves. I had never been to a high school party before, and I didn’t know what to expect. Sarah advised me to ditch the braids as she styled my hair, used a violet eyeliner and lent me her favorite V-neck sweater and a pair of her best Gloria Vanderbilt je ans.

When we walked in the door, fudge in hand, Hank was nowhere to be found. Thinking I had made a mistake for coming and getting ready to leave, I felt a hand on my back. It was Hank’s. He hugged me and told me he was glad I finally arrived. When Hank put his arm around me, nothing else existed. With a little help from Cupid or the magic of Beauty’s recipes, I found love.


Fat Dad’s ‘Closet’ Brownies

These brownies are more like fudge than cake and contain a fraction of the flour found in traditional brownie recipes. My father called them “closet” brownies, because when he smelled them coming out of the oven he could imagine hiding in the closet to eat the whole batch. I baked them in the ninth grade for a boy that I had a crush on, and they were more effective than Cupid’s arrow at winning his heart.

6 tablespoons unsalted butter, plus extra for greasing the pan
8 ounces bittersweet chocolate, chopped, or se misweet chocolate chips
3/4 cup brown sugar
2 eggs at room temperature, beaten
1 teaspoon vanilla extract
1/4 cup flour
1/2 cup chopped walnuts (optional)
Fresh berries or powdered sugar for garnish (optional)

1. Preheat oven to 350 degrees.

2. Grease an 8-inch square baking dish.

3. In a double boiler, melt chocolate. Then add butter, melt and stir to blend. Remove from heat and pour into a mixing bowl. Stir in sugar, eggs and vanilla and mix well.

4. Add flour. Mix well until very smooth. Add chopped walnuts if desired. Pour batter into greased baking pan.

5. Bake for 35 minutes, or until set and barely firm in the middle. Allow to cool on a rack before removing from pan. Optional: garnish with powdered sugar, or berries, or both.

Yield: 16 brownies


Dawn Lerman is a New York-based health and nutriti on consultant and founder of Magnificent Mommies, which provides school lectures, cooking classes and workshops. Her series on growing up with a fat father appears occasionally on Well.

Well: Ask Well: Swimming to Ease Back Pain

Well: Ask Well: Swimming to Ease Back Pain

Many people find that recreational swimming helps ease back pain, and there is research to back that up. But some strokes may be better than others.

An advantage to exercising in a pool is that the buoyancy of the water takes stress off the joints. At the same time, swimming and other aquatic exercises can strengthen back and core muscles.

That said, it does not mean that everyone with a case of back pain should jump in a pool, said Dr. Scott A. Rodeo, a team physician for U.S.A. Olympic Swimming at the last three Olympic Games. Back pain can have a number of potential causes, some that require more caution than others. So the first thing to do is to get a careful evaluation and diagnosis. A doctor might recommend working with a physical therapist and starting off with standing exercises in the pool that involve bands and balls to strengthen the core and lower back muscl es.

If you are cleared to swim, and just starting for the first time, pay close attention to your technique. Work with a coach or trainer if necessary. It may also be a good idea to start with the breaststroke, because the butterfly and freestyle strokes involve more trunk rotation. The backstroke is another good option, said Dr. Rodeo, who is co-chief of the sports medicine and shoulder service at the Hospital for Special Surgery in New York.

“With all the other strokes, you have the potential for some spine hyperextension,” Dr. Rodeo said. “With the backstroke, being on your back, you don’t have as much hyperextension.”

Like any activity, begin gradually, swimming perhaps twice a week at first and then progressing slowly over four to six weeks, he said. In one study, Japanese researchers looked at 35 people with low back pain who were enrolled in an aquatic exercise program, which include d swimming and walking in a pool. Almost all of the patients showed improvements after six months, but the researchers found that those who participated at least twice weekly showed more significant improvements than those who went only once a week. “The improvement in physical score was independent of the initial ability in swimming,” they wrote.

Daily Report: Device Offers Partial Vision for the Blind

Daily Report: Device Offers Partial Vision for the Blind

The Food and Drug Administration on Thursday approved the first treatment to give limited vision to people who are blind, involving a technology called the artificial retina, reports Pam Belluck in Friday’s New York Times.

The device allows people with a certain type of blindness to detect crosswalks on the street, the presence of people or cars, and sometimes even large numbers or letters. The approval of the system marks a milestone in a new frontier in vision research, a field in which scientists are making strides with gene therapy, optogenetics, stem cells and other strategies.

The artificial retina is a sheet of electrodes implanted in the eye. The patient is also given glasses with an attached camera and a portable video processor. This system, called Argus II, allows visual signals to bypass the damaged portion of the retina and be transmitted to the brain.

With the artificial retina or retinal prosthesis, a blind person cannot see in the conventional sense, but can identify outlines and boundaries of objects, especially when there is contrast between light and dark â€" fireworks against a night sky or black socks mixed with white ones.

The F.D.A. approved Argus II, made by Second Sight Medical Products, to treat people with severe retinitis pigmentosa, in which photoreceptor cells, which take in light, deteriorate.

The eyeglass camera captures images, which the video processor translates into pixelized patterns of light and dark, and transmits them to the electrodes. The electrodes then send them to the brain.

“The questions that this particular device raised for F.D.A. were very new,” Dr. Malvina Eydelman, the F.D.A.’s director for the Division of Ophthalmic and Ear, Nose, and Throat Devices, told The Times. “It’s a big step forward for the whole ophthalmology field.”

Kamis, 14 Februari 2013

Doctor and Patient: Afraid to Speak Up to Medical Power

Doctor and Patient: Afraid to Speak Up to Medical Power

The slender, weather-beaten, elderly Polish immigrant had been diagnosed with lung cancer nearly a year earlier and was receiving chemotherapy as part of a clinical trial. I was a surgical consultant, called in to help control the fluid that kept accumulating in his lungs.

During one visit, he motioned for me to come closer. His voice was hoarse from a tumor that spread, and the constant hissing from his humidified oxygen mask meant I had to press my face nearly against his to understand his words.

“This is getting harder, doctor,” he rasped. “I’m not sure I’m up to anymore chemo.”

I was not the only doctor that he confided to. But what I quickly learned was that none of us was eager to broach the topic of stopping treatment with his primary cancer doctor.

That doctor was a rising superstar in the world of oncology, a brilliant physician-researcher who had helped discover treatments for other cancers and who had been recruited to lead our hospital’s then lackluster cancer center. Within a few months of the doctor’s arrival, the once sleepy department began offering a dazzling array of experimental drugs. Calls came in from outside doctors eager to send their patients in for treatment, and every patient who was seen was promptly enrolled in one of more than a dozen well-documented treatment protocols.

But now, no doctors felt comfortable suggesting anything but the most cutting-edge, aggressive treatments.

Even the No. 2 doctor in the cancer center, Robin to the chief’s cancer-battling Batman, was momentarily taken aback when I suggested we reconsider the patient’s chemotherapy plan. “I don’t want to tell him,” he said, eyes widening. He reeled off his chief’s vast accomplishments. “I mean, who am I to tell him what to do?”

We stood for a moment in silence before he pointed his ind ex finger at me. “You tell him,” he said with a smile. “You tell him to consider stopping treatment.”

Memories of this conversation came flooding back last week when I read an essay on the problems posed by hierarchies within the medical profession.

For several decades, medical educators and sociologists have documented the existence of hierarchies and an intense awareness of rank among doctors. The bulk of studies have focused on medical education, a process often likened to military and religious training, with elder patriarchs imposing the hair shirt of shame on acolytes unable to incorporate a profession’s accepted values and behaviors. Aspiring doctors quickly learn whose opinions, experiences and voices count, and it is rarely their own. Ask a group of interns who’ve been on t he wards for but a week, and they will quickly raise their hands up to the level of their heads to indicate their teachers’ status and importance, then lower them toward their feet to demonstrate their own.

It turns out that this keen awareness of ranking is not limited to students and interns. Other research has shown that fully trained physicians are acutely aware of a tacit professional hierarchy based on specialties, like primary care versus neurosurgery, or even on diseases different specialists might treat, like hemorrhoids and constipation versus heart attacks and certain cancers.

But while such professional preoccupation with privilege can make for interesting sociological fodder, the real issue, warns the author of a courageous essay published recently in The New England Journal of Medi cine, is that such an overly developed sense of hierarchy comes at an unacceptable price: good patient care.

Dr. Ranjana Srivastava, a medical oncologist at the Monash Medical Centre in Melbourne, Australia, recalls a patient she helped to care for who died after an operation. Before the surgery, Dr. Srivastava had been hesitant to voice her concerns, assuming that the patient’s surgeon must be “unequivocally right, unassailable, or simply not worth antagonizing.” When she confesses her earlier uncertainty to the surgeon after the patient’s death, Dr. Srivastava learns that the surgeon had been just as loath to question her expertise and had assumed that her silence before the surgery meant she agreed with his plan to operate.

“Each of us was trying our best to help a patient, but we were also respecting the boundaries and hierarchy imposed by our professional culture,” Dr. Srivastava said. “The tragedy was that the patient died, when speaking up wo uld have made all the difference.”

Compounding the problem is an increasing sense of self-doubt among many doctors. With rapid advances in treatment, there is often no single correct “answer” for a patient’s problem, and doctors, struggling to stay up-to-date in their own particular specialty niches, are more tentative about making suggestions that cross over to other doctors’ “turf.” Even as some clinicians attempt to compensate by organizing multidisciplinary meetings, inviting doctors from all specialties to discuss a patient’s therapeutic options, “there will inevitably be a hierarchy at those meetings of who is speaking,” Dr. Srivastava noted. “And it won’t always be the ones who know the most about the patient who will be taking the lead.”

It is the potentially disastrous repercussions for patients that make this overly developed awareness of rank and boundaries a critical issue in medicine. Recent efforts to raise safety standards and improve patient care have shown that teams are a critical ingredient for success. But simply organizing multidisciplinary lineups of clinicians isn’t enough. What is required are teams that recognize the importance of all voices and encourage active and open debate.

Since their patient’s death, Dr. Srivastava and the surgeon have worked together to discuss patient cases, articulate questions and describe their own uncertainties to each other and in patients’ notes. “We have tried to remain cognizant of the fact that we are susceptible to thinking about hierarchy,” Dr. Srivastava said. “We have tried to remember that sometimes, despite our best intentions, we do not speak up for our patients because we are fearful of the consequences.”

That was certainly true for my lung cancer patient. Like all the other doctors involved in his care, I hesitated to talk to the chief medical oncologist. I questioned my own credentials, my lack of expertise in this particular area of oncology and even my own clinical judgment. When the patient appeared to fare better, requiring less oxygen and joking and laughing more than I had ever seen in the past, I took his improvement to be yet another sign that my attempt to talk about holding back chemotherapy was surely some surgical folly.

But a couple of days later, the humidified oxygen mask came back on. And not long after that, the patient again asked for me to come close.

This time he said: “I’m tired. I want to stop the chemo.”

Just before he died, a little over a week later, he was off all treatment except for what might make him comfortable. He thanked me and the other doctors for our care, but really, we should have thanked him and apologized. Because he had pushed us out of our comfortable, well-delineated professional zones. He had prodded us to talk to one another. And he showed us how to work as a team in order to do, at last, what we should have done weeks earlier.

Life, Interrupted: Crazy, Unsexy Cancer Tips

Life, Interrupted: Crazy, Unsexy Cancer Tips

Life, Interrupted

Suleika Jaouad writes about her experiences as a young adult with cancer.

Every few weeks I host a “girls’ night” at my apartment in Lower Manhattan with a group of friends who are at various stages in their cancer treatments. Everyone brings something to eat and drink, and we sit around my living room talking to one another about subjects both heavy and light, ranging from post-chemo hair styling tips, fears of relapse or funny anecdotes about a recent hospital visit. But one topic that doesn’t come up as often as you might think â€" particularly at a gathering of women in their early 20s and 30s â€" is sex.

Actually, I alm ost didn’t write this column. Time and again, I’ve sat down to write about sex and cancer, but each time I’ve deleted the draft and moved on to a different topic. Writing about cancer is always a challenge for me because it hits so close to home. And this topic felt even more difficult. After my diagnosis at age 22 with leukemia, the second piece of news I learned was that I would likely be infertile as a result of chemotherapy. It was a one-two punch that was my first indication that issues of cancer and sexual health are inextricably tied.

But to my surprise, sex is not at the center of the conversation in the oncology unit â€" far from it. No one has ever broached the topic of sex and cancer during my diagnosis and treatment. Not doctors, not nurses. On the rare occasions I initiated the conversation myself, talking about sex and cancer felt like a shameful secret. I felt embarrassed about the changes taking place in my body after chemotherapy treatment began â€" changes that for me included hot flashes, infertility and early menopause. Today, at age 24, when my peers are dating, marrying and having children of their own, my cancer treatments are causing internal and external changes in my body that leave me feeling confused, vulnerable, frustrated â€" and verifiably unsexy.

When sex has come up in conversations with my cancer friends, it’s hardly the free-flowing, liberating conversation you see on television shows like HBO’s “Girls” or “Sex and the City.” When my group of cancer friends talk about sex â€" maybe it’s an exaggeration to call it the blind leading the blind â€" we’re just a group of young women who have received little to no information about the sexual side effects of our disease.

One friend worried that sex had become painful as a result of pelvic radiation treatment. Another described difficulty reaching orgasm and wondered if it was a side effect of chemotherapy. And yet another talk ed about her oncologist’s visible discomfort when she asked him about safe birth control methods. “I felt like I was having a conversation with my uncle or something,” she told me. As a result, she turned to Google to find out if she could take a morning-after pill. “I felt uncomfortable with him and had nowhere to turn,” she said.

This is where our conversations always run into a wall. Emotional support â€" we can do that for one another. But we are at a loss when it comes to answering crucial medical questions about sexual health and cancer. Who can we talk to? Are these common side effects? And what treatments or remedies exist, if any, for the sexual side effects associated with cancer?

If mine and my girlfriends’ experiences are indicative of a trend, then the way women with cancer are being educated about their sexual health is not by their health care providers but on their own. I was lucky enough to meet a counselor who specializes in the sexu al health of cancer patients at a conference for young adult cancer patients. Sage Bolte, a counselor who works for INOVA Life With Cancer, a Virginia-based nonprofit organization that provides free resources for cancer patients, was the one to finally explain to me that many of the sexual side effects of cancer are both normal and treatable.

“Part of the reason you feel shame and embarrassment about this is because no one out there is saying this is normal. But it is,” Dr. Bolte told me. “Shame on us as health care providers that we have not created an environment that is conducive to talking about sexual health.”

Dr. Bolte said part of the problem is that doctors are so focused on saving a cancer patient’s life that they forget to discuss issues of sexual health. “My sense is that it’s not about physicians or health care providers not caring about your sexual health or thinking that it’s unimportant, but that cancer is the emergency, and everyth ing else seems to fall by the wayside,” she said.

She said that one young woman she was working with had significant graft-versus-host disease, a potential side effect of stem cell transplantation that made her skin painfully sensitive to touch. Her partner would try to hold her hand or touch her stomach, and she would push him away or jump at his touch. It only took two times for him to get the message that “she didn’t want to be touched,” Dr. Bolte said. Unfortunately, by the time they showed up at Dr. Bolte’s office and the young woman’s condition had improved, she thought her boyfriend was no longer attracted to her. Her boyfriend, on the other hand, was afraid to touch her out of fear of causing pain or making an unwanted pass. All that was needed to help them reconnect was a little communication.

Dr. Bolte also referred me to resources like the American Association of Sexuality Educators, Counselors and Therapist s; the Society for Sex Therapy and Research; and the Association of Oncology Social Workers, all professional organizations that can help connect cancer patients to professionals trained in working with sexual health issues and the emotional and physical concerns related to a cancer diagnosis.

I know that my girlfriends and I are not the only women out there who are wondering how to help themselves and their friends answer difficult questions about sex and cancer. Sex can be a squeamish subject even when cancer isn’t part of the picture, so the combination of sex and cancer together can feel impossible to talk about. But women like me and my friends shouldn’t have to suffer in silence.


Suleika Jaouad (pronounced su-LAKE-uh ja-WAD) is a 24-year-old writer who lives in New York City. Her column, “Life, Interrupted,” chronicling her experiences as a young adult with cancer , appears regularly on Well. Follow @suleikajaouad on Twitter.

Use of Morning-After Pill Is Rising, Report Says

Use of Morning-After Pill Is Rising, Report Says

The use of morning-after pills by American women has more than doubled in recent years, driven largely by rising rates of use among women in their early 20s, according to new federal data released Thursday.

The finding is likely to add to the public debate over rules issued by the Obama administration under the new health care law that require most employers to provide free coverage of birth control, including morning-after pills, to female employees. Some religious institutions and some employers have objected to the requirement and filed lawsuits to block its enforcement.

Morning-after pills, which help prevent pregnancy after sex, were used by 11 percent of sexually active women from 2006 to 2010, the period of the study. That was up from just 4 percent in 2002. Nearly one in four women between the ages of 20 and 24 who had ever had sex have used the pill at some point, the data show.

Morning-after pills are particularly controversial among some conservative groups who contend they can cause abortions by interfering with the implantation of a fertilized egg that the groups regard as a person.

Medical experts say that portrayal is inaccurate, and that studies provide strong evidence that the most commonly used pills do not hinder implantation, but work by delaying or preventing ovulation so that an egg is never fertilized in the first place, or thicken cervical mucus so sperm have trouble moving.

This month, the Obama administration offered a proposal that could expand the number of groups that do not need to provide or pay for birth control coverage. But the proposal did not end the political fight over the issue, which legal experts say may end up in the Supreme Court.

The new data was released by the National Center for Health Statistics and based on interviews with more than 12,000 women from 2006 to 2010. Researchers asked sexually active women if they had ever used emergency contraception, “also known as Plan B, Preven or morning-after pills,” as well as about their use of other forms of birth control.

Over all, 99 percent of sexually active women ages 15 to 44 have used contraception at some point in their lives, or about 53 million women, up slightly from 2002. An earlier report found that 62 percent of all women of reproductive age were currently using some form of birth control.

The new report found that 98.6 percent of sexually active Catholic women had used contraception at some point, but the data did not show how many Catholic women currently use contraception.

Condom use has risen markedly. More than 93 percent of women said they had partners who had used condoms at some point, compared with 82 percent of women in 1995, a likely effect of strong public advocacy for condom use during the AIDS epidemic.

In contrast, women who had used intrauterine devices, or IUDs, at some point in their lives declined to about 8 percent from 10 percent in 1995. The use of birth control pills has remained steady since 1995 at 82 percent.

Eighty-nine percent of white women said they had used birth control pills at some point, compared with 67 percent of Hispanic women, 78 percent of black women and 57 percent of Asian women.

Education played a role in the type of contraception used. Forty percent of women without a high school diploma said they chose sterilization, while just 10 percent of women with a bachelor’s degree said they used that method. Those without a high school diploma were also far more likely to use three-month injectables, like Depo-Provera â€" 36 percent compared with 13 percent of women with a college degree.

About 12 percent of college graduates said they had used emergency contraception, while 7 percent of women with only a high school degree said they had used it.

Educated women were far more likely to have practiced periodic abstinence based on the menstrual cycle. About 28 percent of women with a master’s degree or higher had practiced this method, while just 13 percent of women without a high school diploma had, the report found.

White women, American-born Hispanic women and black women were most likely to practice withdrawal, with more than half of women in each group saying they have used that method. Just 44 percent of foreign-born Hispanics said they practiced withdrawal.